Evaluation – Scientific Workshop – W050945-B Session Title: One Clinical and Laboratory Information System: The Blood, Sweat and Cheers Towards Laboratory Standardization Presenters: Jessica Boyd, Alberta Precision Laboratories Michelle Parker, DynaLIFE Medical Labs Albert Tsui, Alberta Precision Laboratories Alison Venner, Alberta Precision Laboratories Objectives: At the conclusion of this session, participants will be able to explain and apply: Explain the goal and purpose of a single, province-wide clinical (CIS) and laboratory information system (LIS) in Alberta Discuss the roles of clinical biochemists in planning, testing, and implementation of Epic Beaker in urban/regional/rural hospitals, community reference laboratories, and point of care testing. Describe the path, challenges and achievements of laboratory standardization in preanalytical, analytical and post-analytical phases for a common CIS/LIS Identify areas where standardization may not always be the answer, and provide solutions to fit within the single CIS/LIS model Summarize the tips, tricks and challenges in implementing one LIS with a common POCT connectivity solution. 1. Please rate the Session by choosing the appropriate number: Rating Scale:1 Strongly Disagree, 2 Disagree, 3 Neutral, 4 Agree, 5 Strongly AgreeSufficient time was allowed for audience participation/active learning. One Two Three Four Five The facilities were satisfactory. One Two Three Four Five The session was free from commercial bias. One Two Three Four Five Overall, I would rate this Symposium as excellent. One Two Three Four Five 2. Please assess the Speaker by choosing the appropriate number: Rating Scale:1 Strongly Disagree, 2 Disagree, 3 Neutral, 4 Agree, 5 Strongly Agree Jessica Boyd, Alberta Precision LaboratoriesClarity of One Two Three Four Five Met Stated Objectives One Two Three Four Five Balanced & Unbiased One Two Three Four Five Relevant to Practice Overall One Two Three Four Five Time for Active Learning One Two Three Four Five 3. Please assess the Speaker by choosing the appropriate number. Rating Scale:1 Strongly Disagree, 2 Disagree, 3 Neutral, 4 Agree, 5 Strongly Agree Michelle Parker, DynaLIFE Medical Labs Clarity of One Two Three Four Five Met Stated Objectives One Two Three Four Five Balanced & Unbiased One Two Three Four Five Relevant to Practice Overall One Two Three Four Five Time for Active Learning One Two Three Four Five 3. Please asses the Speaker by circling the appropriate number. Rating Scale:1 Strongly Disagree, 2 Disagree, 3 Neutral, 4 Agree, 5 Strongly Agree Albert Tsui, Alberta Precision Laboratories Clarity of One Two Three Four Five Met Stated Objectives One Two Three Four Five Balanced & Unbiased One Two Three Four Five Relevant to Practice Overall One Two Three Four Five Time for Active Learning One Two Three Four Five 3. Please assess the Speaker by choosing the appropriate number. Rating Scale:1 Strongly Disagree, 2 Disagree, 3 Neutral, 4 Agree, 5 Strongly Agree Alison Venner, Alberta Precision Laboratories Clarity of One Two Three Four Five Met Stated Objectives One Two Three Four Five Balanced & Unbiased One Two Three Four Five Relevant to Practice Overall One Two Three Four Five Time for Active Learning One Two Three Four Five 4. As a result of attending this session, I am planning to: (please check one)a) Discuss the session with my colleagues Yes No b) Pursue additional learning activities. Yes No c) Complete a Personal Learning Project. Yes No d) Not change my practice. Yes No 3) Change my practice. Yes No 5. Please explain the change you are planning to make or the learning you plan to complete:6. Please indicate which CanMEDS roles you felt were addressed during this educational activity. (Select all that apply) Medical Expert Communicator Collaborator Manager Health Advocate Scholar Professional 7. General comments about individual speakers8. What topics need to be addressed at future conferences to keep you up to date in your profession?Name Session Title Date Year Location Conference/Event CreditsEmail Session Code
