Evaluation – Scientific Workshop – W050800-B Session Title: Evidence-based Approach from the Canadian Society for Clinical Chemists (CSCC) Working Group on Reference Interval Harmonization (hRI) Presenters: Khosrow Adeli, The Hospital for Sick Children Dana Bailey, Dynacare Mary Kathryn Bohn, The Hospital for Sick Children Christine Collier, Royal Columbian Hospital Objectives: At the conclusion of this session, participants will be able to explain and apply: Outline the major gaps in reference intervals and the critical need for harmonization across clinical laboratories Describe the major advances made by the CSCC Working Group on Reference Interval Harmonization Discuss the development and validation of common reference intervals and their implementation across Canada 1. Please rate the Session by choosing the appropriate number: Rating Scale:1 Strongly Disagree, 2 Disagree, 3 Neutral, 4 Agree, 5 Strongly AgreeSufficient time was allowed for audience participation/active learning. One Two Three Four Five The facilities were satisfactory. One Two Three Four Five The session was free from commercial bias. One Two Three Four Five Overall, I would rate this Symposium as excellent. One Two Three Four Five 2. Please assess the Speaker by choosing the appropriate number: Rating Scale:1 Strongly Disagree, 2 Disagree, 3 Neutral, 4 Agree, 5 Strongly Agree Khosrow Adeli, The Hospital for Sick ChildrenClarity of One Two Three Four Five Met Stated Objectives One Two Three Four Five Balanced & Unbiased One Two Three Four Five Relevant to Practice Overall One Two Three Four Five Time for Active Learning One Two Three Four Five 3. Please assess the Speaker by choosing the appropriate number. Rating Scale:1 Strongly Disagree, 2 Disagree, 3 Neutral, 4 Agree, 5 Strongly Agree Dana Bailey, Dynacare Clarity of One Two Three Four Five Met Stated Objectives One Two Three Four Five Balanced & Unbiased One Two Three Four Five Relevant to Practice Overall One Two Three Four Five Time for Active Learning One Two Three Four Five 3. Please asses the Speaker by circling the appropriate number. Rating Scale:1 Strongly Disagree, 2 Disagree, 3 Neutral, 4 Agree, 5 Strongly Agree Mary Kathryn Bohn, The Hospital for Sick Children Clarity of One Two Three Four Five Met Stated Objectives One Two Three Four Five Balanced & Unbiased One Two Three Four Five Relevant to Practice Overall One Two Three Four Five Time for Active Learning One Two Three Four Five 3. Please assess the Speaker by choosing the appropriate number. Rating Scale:1 Strongly Disagree, 2 Disagree, 3 Neutral, 4 Agree, 5 Strongly Agree Christine Collier, Royal Columbian Hospital Clarity of One Two Three Four Five Met Stated Objectives One Two Three Four Five Balanced & Unbiased One Two Three Four Five Relevant to Practice Overall One Two Three Four Five Time for Active Learning One Two Three Four Five 4. As a result of attending this session, I am planning to: (please check one)a) Discuss the session with my colleagues Yes No b) Pursue additional learning activities. Yes No c) Complete a Personal Learning Project. Yes No d) Not change my practice. Yes No 3) Change my practice. Yes No 5. Please explain the change you are planning to make or the learning you plan to complete:6. Please indicate which CanMEDS roles you felt were addressed during this educational activity. (Select all that apply) Medical Expert Communicator Collaborator Manager Health Advocate Scholar Professional 7. General comments about individual speakers8. What topics need to be addressed at future conferences to keep you up to date in your profession?Name Session Title Date Year Location Conference/Event CreditsEmail Session Code
